Comment on this poll.
You must be logged in to the O'Reilly Network to post a comment.

Showing messages 1 through 14 of 14.

• Firebird
  2004-11-19 16:31:26  unhappyComputer [Reply | View]
  
  
  Is Firebird really this popular??

• Real voting?
  2004-02-12 15:03:47  georg@php.net [Reply | View]
  
  
  Looks like O'Reilly's voting system is not state of the art (no ip and timeframe check). But obviously it looks like MySQL users are not cheating!
  
  Interesting posting from pgsql-advocacy:
  
  From: [removed]
  Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA
  Date: February 9, 2004 06:12:20 MST
  To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
  
  Thankfully, their website database is not PostgreSQL. We don't have to
  worry about Referential Integrity catching duplicate votes...

• Preferred DB
  2004-02-10 12:40:20  rmatwater [Reply | View]
  
  
  Other - NexusDB!
  You really ought to add it to the list of choices

• If Enthusiasm Counts for Anything
  2004-02-10 08:21:51  jrodenhi [Reply | View]
  
  
  At present it looks like there is a strong show of support for Firebird. If you have not checked it out, this might be a good time to. I work with MS SQL Server all day long. When I switch to my personal DB pursuits, Firebird seems like the easiest transition. For a great free GUI front end, IBOConsole is a natural.

• It's spelled PostgreSQL
  2004-02-09 09:30:25  scott_marlowe [Reply | View]
  
  
  Just a hint. Postgres is an older database, that became Postgres95, then PostgreSQL.
  
  Please, could someone correct the spelling in the poll? Or is it too late once it's online?
• It's spelled PostgreSQL
  2004-02-09 10:41:27  Mary Hubben | [Reply | View]
  
  
  Thanks, Scott. I've changed it.
• It's spelled PostgreSQL
  2004-02-09 11:22:44  scott_marlowe [Reply | View]
  
  
  thanks!
• It's spelled PostgreSQL
  2004-02-09 18:29:27  Chris DiBona | [Reply | View]
  
  
  Yep, sorry bout that.

• PostgreSQL
  2004-02-08 12:00:24  sql364 [Reply | View]
  
  
  Hopefuly with PostgreSQL coming with some support here, O'reilly will perhaps add a PostgreSQL section along with the MySQL one ;-)
  
  PostgreSQL has been largely ignored by O'Reilly so far....
• PostgreSQL
  2004-02-10 15:36:10  Jonathan Gennick | [Reply | View]
  
  
  It is true that we haven't aggressively pursued PostgreSQL books. However, we'd be happy to look at proposals.

• SQL Server
  2004-02-06 20:48:04  Corvus [Reply | View]
  
  
  Surely one or two people use SQL Server?
• SQL Server
  2004-02-08 11:58:40  sql364 [Reply | View]
  
  
  one or two, surely!
• SQL Server
  2004-02-11 10:16:35  Chris DiBona | [Reply | View]
  
  
  Oh sure, but I just forgot it...seriously! no malice...it jsut wasn't in that slot in my brain.
  
  Chris

• dbs
  2004-02-06 18:27:25  nexex [Reply | View]
  
  
  oh man its dBASE and FoxPRO forever! ;)