In case you hadn’t seen it, the US Supreme Court has upped the ante in the software patent fight. This article in The Register reviews a recent ruling by the USSC about what constitutes ‘obviousness’ in a patent. Now, instead of getting experts to argue whether a patent is valid or not, and having a judge weight the evidence, there has to be physical evidence that someone thought of it before the person who applied for the patent.
From the article:
The Federal Court of Appeals has recently used a “suggestion test” to determine whether or not a patent is “obvious”. The EFF argues that the test forces those opposing a patent’s grant to produce documents proving that even the most obvious improvement has been suggested before.
So, now is the time for all good geeks to come to the aid of there software. The first thing to do is to start blogging about every obvious invention you can think of. It doesn’t matter what it is. If you think of it, blog it. Blog everything you can. Don’t keep it to yourself, or assume everyone knows its the next step.
With all of the recent Blackboard patent fiasco, I really wish I had published some of the ideas I had floating around in the early 90’s. But there wasn’t a medium to do it. I would have had to write a peer-reviewed article for a journal, and ideas for future products aren’t likely to get accepted. But now we have blogs. I’m going to start a new blog and write down everything I think of to keep someone from patenting the damn idea.
Perhaps we need a new web app. Here’s my prior art on a system called -Register the Obvious. The invention is a place where anyone can login, create an account, and then register their obvious ideas. They will be encouraged to think of the most trivial inventions and improvements possible, and put them on a website. The site will include tools for thinking of obvious inventions (think of two prieces of software, put them together, write down the resulting system).
I think we could get a great database of creativity up and running. Who knows, it might even lead to some real innovation…

s/there/their
Looks like you misread the article. The decision was not by the US Supreme Court, but by a lower court, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.
The EFF is now asking the Supreme Court to rule on the case. According to the EFF, the case will be heard by the Supreme Court in the fall. It will then take them several months to rule on it.
Your advice to blog about obvious inventions is still a good idea, though.
I'm just setting up a TWiki at bleedingobvious.org for exactly this purpose :)
Not much there yet - check back in a few hours.
Whoops. I did misread the article. Thanks for point that out. It was Federal Circuit Court and EFF has asked the Supremes to review it.
My apologies....
So in otherwords, you take away the motivation for coming up with ideas. I know a lot of you feel that "infomation should be free" and such, but unless you know of a way of getting food, shelter and all the nice items for free, I don't think this is a good idea.
This is not a Star Trek universe where money is not a motivation. You cannot make enough money with a service based industry. Intellectual property is what builds wealth.
Maybe 200 years from now there will be different motivations, but for now, no.
I agree with the new ruling. Only physical evidence should constitute to prior art. Ideas "dreamt-up" but not acted upon should be considered abandoned and disqualify as prior art or deemed obvious.
Chech out this web site, theyv'e had soom post that could prove 'prior art'
Opps Here's the site:- http://www.shouldexist.org/
We have something vaguely similar .
Our ummmmm, 'inventor' Grant Hunter' periodically pastes up his 'inventions'.
http://www.ohpurleese.com/inventions.htm
We also keep a list of 'unusually imaginative' fresh US patents, updated every week or so.
http://www.ohpurleese.com/patents.htm
like, for example , this one :
http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/patog/week35/OG/html/1309-5/US07096526-20060829.html
The idea being to draw attention to the slightly less than 100% squeaky-clean world of patenting . . . via humour . . .
Best regards,
Martin G
ReallyMagazine
Sadly, there are penalties for using a patented idea in your product without a license, yet there won't be any penalties for submitting a patent application containing nothing but ideas that have been blogged a hundred times.