Related link: http://news.com.com/2100-1012-996272.html
The slight loosening of conditions for licensing Windows CE has gotten
a lot of coverage in the press, but this critical viewpoint has not.
There is nothing unusual about a company trying to benefit by re-appropriating the work
done by people to whom it offers source code. Netscape/AOL, for
instance, explicitly said in its Mozilla license that it could take
any changes back and use it in proprietary products.
Is this the reason for the changes to shared source licensing?