Today’s big browser news (heh, sounds like a web site O’Reilly should set up ;) is the Preview Release of Firefox 1.0 (download), and the inclusion within it of a clever system that combines RSS feeds and bookmarks.
Visit a web site with the location of its feed properly specified in the header, and the new Firefox pops up a little RSS icon in the status bar at the bottom of the window. Make with the clicky-clicky for about two seconds, and you can save the RSS feed as what Firefox calls a “live bookmark” (see MozillaZine for more detail).
My screenshot shows the results:
This is a very attractive way of doing things. Your feeds are brought into your browser, rather than a browser being coded into your aggregator.
What’s also nice is the way you can organize your live bookmarks just like any other bookmark. So if you want to have a folder of often-read feeds on your Bookmarks Bar for quick reference, you can; and if you want to save a bunch of other, less-important feeds into folders deeper down the bookmarks hierarchy, you can do that too. Neat.
(Of course, anyone who likes downloading and using the Firefox nightly builds will have known about this feature for months. But it’s new to the rest of us.)
Do you live for Live Bookmarks?



as i posted elsewhere...
great feature, when it works.
when it doesn't, there's no usability feedback given AT ALL as to why. the link just won't do anything. the url is "about:livemark-failed", but even that doesn't have a usability message.
whether its bad url, bad xml, bad rss/rdf/atom, or bug in firefox, nobody knows.
hopefully 1.0 final will fix that 'cause right now its a usability nightmare.
"its feed properly specified in the header"
What response header value provides RSS feed discovery? This is the fIrst I've heard of this, but it sounds rather useful.
"its feed properly specified in the header"
it's not a http response header, it's a <link> tag in the head section of the html document.
Something like:
<link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="O'Reilly Network Articles" href="http://www.oreillynet.com/meerkat/?_fl=rss10&t=ALL&c=916" />
Looks familiar
Anyone notice similarity between this and Safari 2.0?
as i posted elsewhere...
I am seeing this problem too. after investigating, I found that Firefox doesn't seem to like a CDATA tag in the XML.
this doesn't work:
This does:
Automating Smart-Client