It’s Christmas in Summer. The iPhone arrives in just a few days, along with Pixar’s new film, Ratatouille. The new Canon 1D Mark III is slowly starting to ship out to people and I was lucky enough to get mine late last week. And then, to top it all off, the 1.1 release of Lightroom is now available. There is a long laundry list of things that are new or fixed in Lightroom 1.1, and you can read up all about them in the Lightroom 1.1 Read Me PDF. All of the changes, however, are in the details. From a wide view, Lightroom looks and acts much as before.

As far as the details of what’s changed, and as I posted a few weeks ago, there were four things I really wanted to see out of Lightroom 1.1.
- Support for the Canon EOS 1D Mark III: Check. This is a key feature for me as my Mark III just arrived last week and I’ve been getting up to speed on it. It’ll be a few more weeks before I’ll use it on assignment, but now I’ll be comfortable using it in my current Lightroom-based workflow.
- All the goodies from ACR 4.1: Check. This one was obvious, but having worked with the new sharpen and clarity tools in ACR 4.1, I was really looking forward to using them in Lightroom.
- A fix for the bug affecting the editing of metadata for multiple items in the library: Check. I was so happy when I tested this out. Not having to dance around this little issue will save me a second here and a second there. On a big shoot, that can add up to lunch.
- An SDK: Strike. There isn’t an SDK yet for Lightroom. This was brought up in the comments to my post, so I wasn’t surprised. And, really, I’d rather have 1.1 now and wait a bit more for the SDK, all things considered.
In the short time that I’ve been kicking the tires since downloading the update, there are several things that have caught my attention. For example, the UI now sports more controls and has a slightly evolved look and feel. Here’s the Metadata editor panel in Lightroom 1.1:

Another thing I quickly noticed is that Lightroom gives you some more ways to see how you produce your images. A while back, I wrote a post here about how it was useful to me to have an idea of what lenses I use most, and which ones seem to collect dust. In Lightroom 1.1, you can now see what shutter, aperture, and ISO settings you use most. Here’s a view of it in action:

I’m sure that when I import my main library into 1.1, I’ll be able to get a bit of useful information out of this data. Or at least, I’ll be able to confirm that I shoot a lot in conditions that require ISO 1600 and have just enough light to eek out 1/100 of a second at f/4.
After kicking the tires a bit and seeing what was new with the interface, I turned to more important matters: Seeing how the Mark III and Lightroom 1.1. get along. I was able to enlist the help of my ever patient model, Boogie the cat, and after sorting out that he really wanted to hang out indoors, I cranked out some test shots at ISO 1600 with an aperture of f/4, a combination I use all too often in my professional work. You can see the full image above, but to get an idea of what the import looks like, here’s a 50% crop view of Boogie’s eye:

This is almost as-is from the intial import. The only thing that I did after import was set Clarity to 30. At normal viewing distances, the effect of the Clarity tool is perfect and it’s something that I can see myself using all of the time from here on out.
Now that Lightroom 1.1 is out, my fellow Inside Lightroom bloggers will jump in and contribute their own favorite new features and there will be lots of discussion about how to use them. I’m looking forward to it. Christmas in Summertime, indeed.


The performance improvements to me is the best thing about 1.1. Well done Adobe!
My initial thoughts on LR 1.1 are that it is a LOT quicker displaying images and finding them in the library.
One problem I have found is that when I export the files as a jpeg after developing - the colours do not look the same as in lightroom! They tend to look a bit dull - has anyone else noticed this?
Right now, I've got around 20,000 images in my Lightroom library, which is my work from this year. When the library was on a FW 400 drive and the drive was 90% full, it was fairly sluggish in Lightroom 1.0. But, it's really easy to blame the disc access for that. I've since moved the main library over to an internal drive in a desktop machine and things are much smoother, even with the primary images out on the FW 400 drive still.
LR 1.1 feels snappier as well, though I haven't really quantified it yet. At some point, I'll try to load it down and see where it bogs.
Also, when it comes to slow catalogs, I've been reading over on the Adobe forums and apparently some people have had luck in speeding up their Lightroom databases by exporting out to a new catalog. YMMV.
Thanks for the tip. I'll try more tonight. One thing to note here is that it (LR1.1) is still faster than Aperture on my machine.
Guys, I've some 85000+ photos. I've used the Lightroom betas, but it never quite seemed to work with this size library. What do you do with libraries of this size? Is 1.1 better for this?
Alan: Indeed. I need to still try that, but I haven't had a big problem in getting images to Flickr. A plug in like Connected Flow's plugin for Aperture, however, would be nice.
JB: Try restarting Lightroom and see if your speed is still slow. Whenever I've had a slowdown in Lightroom, a restart usually takes care of things.
I tried on my iMac G5 2.0Ghz and it is slower than 1.0
The reason I moved to Lightroom from Aperture was its speed in 1.0. I was disappointed.
On the issue of exporting to flickr, while the capability isn't built-in, it's drop-dead easy to add by making an export preset that sends files to the flickr uploader.
thanks duncan. true, it's a great way to manage large libraries. i'll be seeing more of it when my digital splurge happens.
There seems to also be an undocumented feature borrowed from Aperture, sluggishness - ever since I upgraded Lightroom to 1.1 it runs about as slow as Aperture which I originally traded in to get rid of spinning color wheel, well now I got it back.
Also my first update attempt failed, after the length conversion process Aperture failed with an error message that it can't change display modes, after that it hung and left a corrupted database behind. I am glad it created a backup of the original and the second attempt went fine.
Also I still wish I would have gotten the ability to apply identity plates to exported files instead of the ugly copyright watermark. Everything else looks promising!
Eric: The lens used is the Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8.
Les: Nope, there's no direct export to places like Flickr or Smugmug. This is one area where Aperture shines in comparison, thanks to their Export API.
Ryan: Nice notes on the upgrade process. Thanks for providing a link. After writing this, I converted my main Lightroom library and it took quite a while as well, even on a Quad CPU Mac Pro. I ended up leaving it alone for a while and doing something else on my laptop.
Karmaduck: If you're still shooting film, you're probably doing all of your organization with lighttables and just scanning your best work in for Photoshop. Even in this case, tools like Lightroom and Aperture can help you, and I personally wouldn't work with scans without a DAM tool. But, these tools shine when you do digital photography. There's no way I could do my job with the 25k images I've taken this year without Lightroom or Aperture to help me. And it turns out that for most of my work, I can do all of the manipulation that I care to in LIghtroom or Aperture. I'm just a simple levels, spot, contrast, sharpen kind of guy on that front.
1.1 looks fantastic. Out of curiosity, what lens did you use for the Boogie photo?
i'm a photographer, but i have yet to see a need for special purpose software like lightroom or aperture. what's the craze? the histograms are slick for toning (though i don't remember it working like true "levels"), but if i want to make repairs or do any more than simple manipulation, i've got to crank up pshop anyway. also, all my work is scanned from film, so no metadata.
James - I haven't played much with the new features yet, but I did post some notes on what to expect of the upgrade process when you're converting libraries of any significant size. Not sure if you've seen similar results.
Lightroom 1.1 library conversion process
Unless I'm missing something in the changelog there still isn't a way to export images to web-based services like Flickr or SmugMug. I'm hoping I just missed it somewhere because.
Happy, happy joy joy!
Awesome! The only thing that can top this release is Leopard :)