Article:  |
10 Reasons We Need Java 3.0 | |
| Subject: | log() -> ln() sounds reasonable to many probrammers | |
| Date: | 2002-08-11 16:39:59 | |
| From: | bezdar | |
|
Response to: Leave log() as log()
|
||
|
However for many software developers log() sounds more like log_10 and ln sounds more like log_e ! BTW it has long been printed on the pocket calculators that way! |
||
Women in Technology
Hear us Roar
