> You are telling me what I am thinking?

No, I'm telling you that you're misusing
terminology in a way that's intended to confuse
and mislead.... Just as the FSF does in its
propaganda. If you're smart, you won't be fooled
by that propaganda.

> I know the difference between Commercial and
> Proprietory and I only dislike Proprietory
> programs.

If that were true, then you would not support
the GPL. The purpose of the GPL is to destroy
vendors and authors of *commercial* software.

> You claim the GNU Operating System cannot exist

No, I did not claim that. However, I do state
that the GPL is unconscionable (and likely
unenforceable) and that such code should be
licensed under a truly free license -- not one
which makes the code very un-free as the GPL
does. (I note that you use the term "Free
Software", with initial caps, indicating that
you may have swallowed the FSF's propaganda hook,
line and sinker. I hope that this is not the case.

> A lot of your comments are pure propaganda

Not so at all. They're supported, 100%, by fact,
and their purpose is to expose the FSF's
misleading and deceptive propaganda.

> and your views are tainted by money from
> what I have read.

I see. You claim that you work as a mechanic.
Does that mean that if you believe that you
should be paid for your work your views are
"tainted by money?"

> Insert coin to play again.

No thanks. You sound too much like a broken
record -- parroting the FSF's "party line" --
already.

--Brett Glass