|
The correct world is "commercial," not proprietary.
You are telling me what I am thinking? I know the difference between Commercial and Proprietory and I only dislike Proprietory programs. Commercial programs can be used alongside Free Software. Commercial Software is sometimes a necessity and is sometimes better.
Then how can you presume to understand my situation?
I do understand part of your situation but as I stated, I do not work in the industry, I am only giving you my opinion about why I choose Free Software. I have programmed for a long time, I started when I was ~10 years old and grew out of it at ~17 as it wasnt morally and financially viable to pursue my hobby further (read: Profession). I did not presume anything about you that you didnt write in your comment, you said you may not have any food as a result of your code being GPLed. I think it is safe for me to 'assume' that you are a Programmer of Proprietory Software.
You claim the GNU Operating System cannot exist and that Free Software cannot have a 'professional image'. In the real world GNU runs alot of the Internet and is starting to run alot of Workstations not to mention alot of embedded devices. A lot of your comments are pure propaganda (read: FUD) and your views are tainted by money from what I have read. I am very open to learning and you taught me nothing today that I didnt already know.
Insert coin to play again.
PS. I work in the Automotive Industry, I am not exactly putting an industry out of business when I fix a car at home. I hope to work with computers one day as that is where my talents are, sure I can get a panel straight as a rule but I can also fix a problem with a computer in less time than most people. I would never want to make more than enough money to put food on the table and to support my few hobbies. You probably are overpaid and underworked but I do not make assumptions and I do not seek to change your situation.
|
> You are telling me what I am thinking?
No, I'm telling you that you're misusing
terminology in a way that's intended to confuse
and mislead.... Just as the FSF does in its
propaganda. If you're smart, you won't be fooled
by that propaganda.
> I know the difference between Commercial and
> Proprietory and I only dislike Proprietory
> programs.
If that were true, then you would not support
the GPL. The purpose of the GPL is to destroy
vendors and authors of *commercial* software.
> You claim the GNU Operating System cannot exist
No, I did not claim that. However, I do state
that the GPL is unconscionable (and likely
unenforceable) and that such code should be
licensed under a truly free license -- not one
which makes the code very un-free as the GPL
does. (I note that you use the term "Free
Software", with initial caps, indicating that
you may have swallowed the FSF's propaganda hook,
line and sinker. I hope that this is not the case.
> A lot of your comments are pure propaganda
Not so at all. They're supported, 100%, by fact,
and their purpose is to expose the FSF's
misleading and deceptive propaganda.
> and your views are tainted by money from
> what I have read.
I see. You claim that you work as a mechanic.
Does that mean that if you believe that you
should be paid for your work your views are
"tainted by money?"
> Insert coin to play again.
No thanks. You sound too much like a broken
record -- parroting the FSF's "party line" --
already.
--Brett Glass