| Article: |
Apple vs. the Bloggers: How It Unfolded and Where It Stands Now | |
| Subject: | Clarifying quote about Apple and NDAs | |
| Date: | 2006-06-19 14:31:01 | |
| From: | rkoman | |
|
A number of readers have raised an issue with a quote from Rob Enderle about Apple's use of NDAs. While it was neither Mr. Enderle's or my intent to suggest that Apple doesn't use NDAs on employees (that would truly be an absurd assertion), it is certainly possible to read the quote in that way, and several people have. Enderle clarifies that Apple does not pre-disclose to media and thus it does not NDA media. In a follow-up email to me he explained:
As a point of fact, according to the (http://www.eff.org/Censorship/Apple_v_Does/)EFF document collection on this case, there were three amicus briefs filed on behalf of Apple, from the Information Technology Industry Council, Genetech and Intel/Business Software Association.
In light of the discussion I did place calls and emails to Apple PR to verify Enderle's statements, but received no response. We'll update the article to reflect this as soon as possible. Finally, while it is interesting (http://daringfireball.net/) to be called names online, I would suggest that it's better to seek clarification than to assume stupidity.
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.
-
Clarifying quote about Apple and NDAs
2006-06-20 09:36:41 RainyDay [View]



Even after “clarification,” Enderle is (still) wrong regarding NDA’s and Apple. They use them like crazy. Anyone privy to any pre-released product is required to sign an NDA, be they press, developer, stock analyst, employee or whatever.
Enderle is also wrong when he says that they do not pre-disclose to the media. Reviewers regularly get advance copies of software, and advance access to new hardware is made available to journalists the calibre of Walt Mossberg.
I rather doubt Apple gives Enderle advance access to anything, however; they know his calibre.