| Article: |
Design Tips for Building Tag Clouds | |
| Subject: | Correction | |
| Date: | 2006-06-15 04:39:25 | |
| From: | KristoferHoch | |
|
Response to: Correction
|
||
|
Denis, I believe the type of Associative array that Jim is speaking of, is a be more free than the Java generic.
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 2 of 2.
-
Correction
2006-06-30 02:00:51 stephan.schmidt [View]
-
Hashes
2006-06-15 08:15:43 Jim Bumgardner |
[View]
Yes, "considerably more code" was the point.
Certainly associative arrays are supported by C++ and Java, via libraries, but they are not built-in data types, as they are in Perl, PHP, Python and Ruby.
The code to construct and manipulate them is more ungainly in the lower-level languages.



Syntactic sugar is nice to have for maps (see Groovy for an example of map sugar in the JVM) but usually in my applications maps are rather filled dynamically than statically.