Article:
 |
|
Use ClickOnce to Deploy Windows Applications
|
| Subject: |
|
This isn't an article, it is an advertisement |
| Date: |
|
2006-04-13 06:46:37 |
| From: |
|
kesfan
|
Response to: This isn't an article, it is an advertisement
|
|
I agree with the first poster, this article has no useful content.
I subscribe to this feed for the articles. I don't mind adverts around the articles, or references to related O'Reilly books in the articles but this kind of item is just pure spam.
If you want to advertise your PDF book, why not write a good, useful introductory article about ClickOnce and then refer to your book for more information? That's the approach other articles take and I think that's perfectly fine and useful. Why break a good model from which everyone benefits?
|
Showing messages 1 through 2 of 2.
-
This isn't an article, it is an advertisement
2006-04-13 07:03:24
Wei-Meng Lee |
[View]
-
This isn't an article, it is an advertisement
2006-04-13 11:17:58
kesfan
[View]
First and foremost, O'Reilly Network have been offering a lot of content for free and readers have been enjoying this benefit for a long time. Ask youself, have you been asked to pay a single cent for the O'Reilly Network content?
And in this particular instance, what O'Reilly has done is advertise that an PDF book is for sale (which happens to be mine). If you don't like it, just ignore it and move to the next article that is free. What a lot of readers do not understand is that publishers do need revenues to survive. The next time you see an advertisement on TV, please remember to write in to complain that "that is just pure spam".
I am sorry this comment of mine has nothing to do with ClickOnce and that I have wasted your valuable time reading it.