Women in Technology

Hear us Roar



Article:
  There Is No Open Source Community
Subject:   The value of an integrated stack (or 1 + 1 = 3)
Date:   2006-01-13 09:36:18
From:   Daniel026
"With prices approaching zero, software developers have two choices when trying to win over users: (1) add features not available elsewhere, and (2) release the source code. There is no other currency of value that developers can extend to users"

This is only true if you consider each piece of software as a point solution. A vendor that provides an integrated set of products that work better with each other than by themselves has something that is less easy to eclipse by commoditizing a single piece. Microsoft being a case in point, but this applies to other major software vendors too.

You may argue that such beneficial interdependence is just a "feature" but that ignores the fact that you can't beat it simply by improving the capabilities of a single piece of it. You have to improve the capabilities of the whole solution. Hence an Open Source office automation product may approach the individual capabilities of a commercial software equivalent, but if that commercial software equivalent can leverage capabilities of a wider solution not available to the open source product then the open source equivalent will never really match the commercial product in terms of business value.
Main Topics Oldest First

Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.

  • The value of an integrated stack (or 1 + 1 = 3)
    2006-01-13 17:04:40  john.mark [View]

    Ah, but IT as a whole is gravitating towards point solutions. It's about lower bar to entry, and rebelling against vendor lockin. I'll go more in depth on that in the follow-up article. I have data points from CA and also some Gartner report that I can't locate at the moment.

    Most of the stuff in this article is really rather boring nuts and bolts stuff. The fun stuff is in the next piece. I may even do some Microsoft bashing ;)