| Article: |
Ruby the Rival | |
| Subject: | Ruby desktop applications | |
| Date: | 2005-11-18 14:05:21 | |
| From: | Nicolay77 | |
|
Could you use Ruby to build a compelling desktop application right now? No. The toolkits don't exist for it. But if the right toolkit were there--it's possible.
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 3 of 3.
-
Ruby desktop applications
2005-12-03 12:49:20 AdrienLamothe [View]
-
Ruby desktop applications
2005-11-21 13:28:41 homeunix [View]
I think Duncan meant something that doesn't suck. Have you tried programming with that stuff? It might look like the half decent crap on linux, but not much better. On Mac it looks like 100% crap, but I am not sure about windows
-
Ruby desktop applications
2005-11-20 19:22:27 James Duncan Davidson |
[View]
I didn't say that you couldn't build a desktop application. I'm well aware of wxWindows and the like. The word I used was compelling. Of course, that's a matter of opinion...



The compelling thing about Ruby is it appears to have all the language features needed to accommodate sophisticated frameworks. Bruce Tate is probably correct in predicting more Ruby frameworks (that will accomplish the same tasks of todays' enterprise Java frameworks.)
Regardless, competition is good and will keep all parties working hard to please their constituents.
- Adrien Lamothe