Is Perl Still Relevant?
Subject:   Some objective, empirical evidence
Date:   2005-07-23 18:12:55
From:   bioinfotools
Response to: Some objective, empirical evidence

I agree with your point! (Well put, too.) As I was saying earlier, rather less clearly, book sales, demand by employers and use by choice will all differ. perhaps what we need is for employers to have more faith in the "experts" they hire to choose these things!

One other thing while I remember: any relationship between fluctuations in Java text sales and the start of university semesters?

Full Threads Newest First

Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.

  • Some objective, empirical evidence
    2005-07-26 23:40:09  AdrienLamothe [View]

    So, to differ from the argumentum ad populum, a language is relevant if it effectively provides results. COBOL is still effectively producing results, so it is certainly relevant to those using it. An otherwise effective language can lose relevance if not maintained to the point where it won't run on the operating systems people use. People are more likely to change operating systems than re-write a successful custom application program. Open source languages minimize this risk by allowing virtually anyone to alter and re-compile them; adherance to programming standards reduce the chances that the source code will require alteration.