||Art and Computer Programming|
|Subject:||(programming(computers) == *art) ? so : what|
i just don't get it. this debate has been surfacing every now and then since decades and each time seems to miss the very obvious (to my eyes, that is): it confuses means with their respective ends and accordingly leads to: nowhere. let's face it: the question whether programming is similar to art is not decidable on the grounds on which it is commonly discussed: those are incomparable categories.