Women in Technology

Hear us Roar


Article:
  POJO Application Frameworks: Spring Vs. EJB 3.0
Subject:   Fatally Flawed Article
Date:   2005-07-12 10:49:51
From:   TS133T
Response to: Fatally Flawed Article

Spring is not standard it is a integration tollkit (I dont even want to say framework because its not based on abstraction but contains implementations against abstraction such as AOP, JMX, JMS, EJB and ect) between standards.
Main Topics Oldest First

Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.

  • Fatally Flawed Article
    2005-07-12 10:58:22  MichaelYuan [View]

    That is why Spring apps contain vendor-dependent integration code (and XML files). Why not make Spring a standard in JCP -- so that all vendors can implement portable integration "toolkits"? Java has a strong tradition to standardize interactions between "components".

    In fact, EJB 3 does some DI (integration) standardization already. Why not Spring?

Recommended for You
 
Sign up today to receive special discounts,
product alerts, and news from O'Reilly.
Privacy Policy >
View Sample Newsletter >