| Article: |
What's Next for X? | |
| Subject: | Looks great...can we try it? | |
| Date: | 2004-09-10 06:34:54 | |
| From: | jkp | |
|
As an OS X user I hav tied running X windows as an alternative to the normal cocoa environment but have turneed an run simply because it seems so archaic next to what i normally use. I would love to have all the features you describe availible to me under X.
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 3 of 3.
-
Looks great...can we try it?
2004-09-10 11:03:27 Edd Dumbill |
[View]
-
stupid STUPID name
2004-11-02 18:09:58 fds [View]
But X.Org is such a horribly stupid name.
It's worse than OpenOffice.org.
Noone should ever use software whose name ends
in .org, .net, .com or some other imitation thereof. It's ridiculous. It's a windowing server, not a hostname/website. They can have http://x.org, and that's fine, but called a piece of software x.org is horribly stupid. -
Looks great...can we try it?
2004-09-10 22:21:35 andrewbastien [View]
X.Org X11R6.8 release is available through Fink now.



X.Org over XFree86 has a political story behind it, you can find it covered on Slashdot if you search for X.Org there. The basic reason is changes in the XFree86 licensing.