Article:  |
The Fight Against Spam, Part 2 | |
| Subject: | 98% isn't that good.. not at all | |
| Date: | 2004-05-25 19:43:26 | |
| From: | mkarver | |
|
Response to: 98% isn't that good
|
||
| I used to just rely on desktop based spam filters, but it was too much work to update all the computers on the network when new versions came out. So I signed up for a server based filter with Sentinare Spam Filtering. Greater then 99.6% is awesome and all server side, so nothing to download and install and maintain. I was gonna use Postini but I heard they are even worse then iMail at 85% effectivness and they have a $250 monthly minimum, so Sentinare was a way better deal at less the $3 a mailbox. I have had zero false positives thus far and really happy with the speed, service & support. | ||
Women in Technology
Hear us Roar
