| Weblog: | Movable Type 3.0 and Eating. | |
| Subject: | Please. | |
| Date: | 2004-05-14 07:33:10 | |
| From: | tima | |
|
Response to: Is Mena eating properly?
|
||
|
This community of artists and writers then can use emacs or notepad with FTP to express themselves. That's like saying Apple should give away their G5's because artists and writers use would their machie to enrich the Internet.
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 2 of 2.
-
Please.
2004-05-15 17:18:46 musnat [Reply | View]
tima, I think you are being insulting to users of MT. Just because they don't want to pay 100$ up to 600$ doesn't mean insulting. You are being insulting to other users I think. You have every right to defend SixApart, maybe you have a financial gain to do so or not, but don't try to insult users like that!!! People just don't want to pay for that price and insulting them for expressing their opinions is insulting itself. Also remember that MT become MT thanks to many of its users who recommended it to their friends. You seem to disregard all of these people.
By the way, I truly understand your pain as a software developer. I am also one of them I truly understand that, but this pricing scheme is totally stupid. They could come up with a fantastic licensing scheme where they could still make lots of money without pissing people off.
For example,
3 blog 3 authors restriction for free version.
unlimited blogs/unlimited authors for personal edition without reselling to others and not hosting other authors' blogs with this license and charge something around 40-60$ for this.
and then commercial licenses which I don't care
author, blog restriction is totally arbitrary, trying to increase the price based on these is not a good idea. That's the main point.
Also provide some more features for the MT 3.0, right now Typekey is not that interesting.
| Showing messages 1 through 2 of 2. |




free (or flexibly priced) licensing is significantly different than free merchandise. how? when apple gives away an emac, they have ONE LESS emac to sell. when mena gives away a license to an amateur photographer... she is not in any way worse off for it. (in fact, i would argue she is better off, because when said photographer turns professional as a result of his great photoblog, he will continue to use and advocate and now pay for MT).
lawrence lessig details this difference in his book free culture. (which is available for free download at http://free-culture.org/)
furthermore, my argument only concerns the non-commercial or personal use of MT. of course for-profit businesses should be paying for MT.