advertisement

Weblog:   Is Open Source Secure?
Subject:   nice
Date:   2004-02-15 10:37:01
From:   nitroburn
I agree with many of your points of his ethics. After did you notice the gigantic microsoft ad on his article? A little biased. YES.


Government (at the US) is the one that sets the security ratings of operating systems. Our government uses linux in applications where it is needed. For instance for national security. open source yet no one knows what open source project they are based upon. That in itself makes it hard for someone to be able to setup an attack against it. Altho for desktop systems at a local school. dells with windows xp(i hate those things).


The main reason people critisize open source is because it is beyond their knowledge. I am learning programming right now. I will be the first to tell you I don't know shit! You can't critic open source if you don't know source!


Lastly, most security flaws are found by geeks. If a lot of geeks can look at source it is less likely that something will be exploited. As with closed source once a security hole is found and exploited it will be ongoing until it is patched.

Full Threads Oldest First

Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.

  • nice
    2004-02-18 00:39:09  musnat [Reply | View]

    I don't know why so many people turn out to be idiots when it comes to Microsoft, but do you see the Microsoft banner ads on this very particular site? Even slashdot shows Microsoft ads? I don't know what to call a person who acuses someone of being biased based on the ads other than an idiot. We see more people on the open source side like these, I don't know why. Also it seems that people on the open source side seem to be more and more dogmatic about very obvious technical issues. People with psychological problems do not see a problem with being rude to others and even threat others so openly just to supress their ideas.

Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.