| Weblog: | To push desktop Linux, radical shift may be required | |
| Subject: | The Killer App is Ubiquity | |
| Date: | 2003-11-14 20:00:55 | |
| From: | anonymous2 | |
|
Response to: The Killer App is Ubiquity
|
||
|
What you are saying to me is that Linux suffers from a critical lack of integration and standards.
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 3 of 3.
-
The Killer App is Ubiquity
2003-11-15 05:35:28 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Good server. A messy failure of a desktop.
One more M$ Troll that has never used the newer "versions" of Linux.
When will trhese people give up Liunx IS the new OS for the NEW Generation.
I have put susE 9.0 on to many home systems to count any more and EVERYONE has loved it even ex XP users comment on how much nicer looking KDE is and how stable linux is. No more rebooting 2 or 3 times aday.
-
The Killer App is Ubiquity
2003-11-14 20:36:23 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
You make many excellent points. I wholeheartedly agree that there must be a single vision/spec for Linux on the desktop - there is no other way to compete against Apple and Micorosoft otherwise.
| Showing messages 1 through 3 of 3. |




> LINUX: WHAT A WASTE OF TIME FOR DEVELOPERS !
Excuse me? I can take a 20 year old Unix program and compile it and have it work on Linux. Can you say the same about a 5 year old Windows program? Likewise, a Unix sysadm from 20 years ago would have no problems administering a Linux box. Now I don't know all that much about Windows, having given up on MS at about Windows 3.1 as they kept changing their OS interfaces so as to hide but not remove design flaws, but I suspect the only Windows administration skill that carries through from release to release is the technique of giving up and re-installing the OS after about 3 hours of trying to fix the problem.
The only reason developers waste their time keeping up with Windows is because Windows has the market share. A developer has only to keep up with the 3 or 4 most recent Windows releases to be able to sell to 90% of the desktop market. And user's are used to being told the same line, which they hear repeatedly "upgrade your windows to make it work." These days will soon be history. When the MS monolopy collapses there will no longer be 3, or perhaps 4, operating systems out there. There will be many more. Your lament above, that you can't fix the user's problem by telling him the same story he's heard before "upgrade Windows", will be heard far and wide. You're going to have to come up with a solution other than "everybody must conform!" At least when dealing with developing technology. (How many times has the DirectX "standard" changed?) It's the future, get used to it.
In the meantime, see freedesktop.org.