| Article: |
The PHP Scalability Myth | |
| Subject: | CGI model vs. in-process model | |
| Date: | 2003-10-17 11:40:23 | |
| From: | anonymous2 | |
|
I hate it when people talk about "CGI model vs. in-process model" or whatever. Even if your interpreter (PHP, Perl, JSP, etc) is running "in-process", you're still using CGI (assuming that the user is sending data).
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 3 of 3.
-
CGI model vs. in-process model
2003-10-17 18:43:58 anonymous2 [View]
Yes, you're right, but at this late date what are we going to call the method of web scripting where the interpreter is re-started per http request? "PRIS" (Per Request Interpreter Startup)? "Out-process" invocation? I think we're probably stuck with "cgi".
-
CGI model vs. in-process model
2003-10-17 13:38:13 anonymous2 [View]
CGI is all about Communicating between your Webserver and an Server-side application and how to transfer the data. See http://www.w3.org/CGI/
-
CGI model vs. in-process model
2003-10-17 12:58:34 anonymous2 [View]
Wrong.
It's all about communication between the server and the program, and if you type something like:
http://mysite.org/foo.php?key=value
you have no idea if CGI is going on on the server. Could be the in-process model, or even something else. (Used to be, it was (almost?) always CGI).
You need to read up.


