| Article: |
The PHP Scalability Myth | |
| Subject: | Java People - can u guys buy a clue? | |
| Date: | 2003-10-17 10:11:56 | |
| From: | anonymous2 | |
|
Ok - fine, maybe 5% of web applications require the features of J2EE. Go ahead and build your site with that.
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 6 of 6.
-
Java People - can u guys buy a clue?
2003-11-03 11:38:15 anonymous2 [View]
-
Java People - can u guys buy a clue?
2003-10-20 15:04:02 anonymous2 [View]
What technology are those sites using now? Java or .Net but it is scalable for the enterprise
-
Java People - can u guys buy a clue?
2003-10-17 15:47:14 anonymous2 [View]
Ok, but why should I buy 10 linux boxes to run PHP? Why not buy 10 linux boxes and run J2EE? Booth are free and if you "only" need the features of PHP, write it all in JSP in the J2EE server.
-
Java People - can u guys buy a clue?
2003-10-17 12:37:30 anonymous2 [View]
Gee, how many well-publicized failures and outages has eBay had over the past few years? Most due to "system upgrades"? Anything written in somebody's garage in two weeks will not be performant, scalable, well-architected, or maintainable (yes, Virginia, there is a difference between all of these terms, though the poster and the article author don't seem to understand this), no matter what the language.
-
Java People - can u guys buy a clue?
2003-10-17 11:56:30 anonymous2 [View]
hmmm...consider then that the "breakthrough" site eBay is re-architecting to J2EE for scalability and maintainability. -
Java People - can u guys buy a clue?
2003-11-17 16:34:23 anonymous2 [View]
you are all rookies. you are all aguing about CPU cycles (someone mentioned C). CPU cycles is not the goal in scalability. is an opitimised assembler app serving a fictitious figure of 1000 pages at once scalable? no, because how do you then serve 2000?
assume slow technology A cans server 100 pages at once. assume faster technology B servers 200 pages at once. A is given more overhead so that it can serve 50 pages simulaneously on seperate servers. A is run on 10 servers, thus serving 50 * 10 = 500 pages at once. A is more scalable than B.



But if you want a highly productive programming staff and willing to think outside of the box. Our choices would be much different.
Oh, and by the way.... I'm a corporate web developer in a JAVA/JSP shop because that's what our management chose. But when I want to be productive, I code in PHP.