| Article: |
The PHP Scalability Myth | |
| Subject: | Performance NOT EQUALS to Scalable | |
| Date: | 2003-10-16 02:08:13 | |
| From: | anonymous2 | |
|
Performance: time to finalize an user action
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 4 of 4.
-
Performance NOT EQUALS to Scalable
2003-10-16 08:11:45 Jack Herrington |
[View]
-
Performance NOT EQUALS to Scalable
2003-10-16 06:35:09 anonymous2 [View]
In other words, with a thousand users accessing a single server, PHP may work as well as Java.
For a million users, 10 servers using J2EE architecture can perform well.
What do you do with PHP?
-
Performance NOT EQUALS to Scalable
2003-10-16 05:20:56 anonymous2 [View]
I think the previous commenter is observing that
*real* scalability is architectural, and explicitly
provides for distribution and parallelization.
That's apt, of course. Without providing details
I can't afford (in time) just now, I'll counter-assert
that, while Java certainly has plenty of distribution
stories told about it, PHP and other scripting alternatives
should feel no shame. I applaud author Jack Herrington
for at least opening the debate with a proper focus on architecture.
His is an article that needed to be written, and I
hope it will be widely read.
CL
-
Performance NOT EQUALS to Scalable
2003-10-16 04:38:39 anonymous2 [View]
scalability is achieved either by having a "read-only" application, which can be easily deployed on multiple servers, or by having a way to distribute the changes on multiple copies of the database. It has a lot more to do with _how_ you write the application rather than which particular language, libraries or platform you choose.



Without more concise information I cannot 'rewrite article'. I appreciate the please though.