| Article: |
Scanners and Mac OS X | |
| Subject: | HP Scanjet 4400 ripoff | |
| Date: | 2003-09-10 15:44:42 | |
| From: | anonymous2 | |
|
Response to: HP Scanjet 4400 ripoff
|
||
|
The problem is not with Hewlett-Packard, the problem exists with Apple. Apple's inability to create an operating system that does not have to be updated with major changes every 3 weeks causes companies like Hewlett-Packard to have to continue to update their software to please the ever demanding Macintosh user.
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 3 of 3.
-
HP Scanjet 4400 ripoff
2003-09-14 22:34:48 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
None of what you said makes any sense at all. Pure fiction.
-
HP Scanjet 4400 ripoff
2003-09-16 05:39:13 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
All operating systems require updating so the suggestion that Apple are in some way different from other Manufacturers is unfair. I think your email address may suggest a bias in your views. It is not unreasonable to assume that peripheral manufacturers would support common operaring systems.
-
HP Scanjet 4400 ripoff
2003-10-21 09:24:28 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Ok, lets be honest at least. OS X IS updated on a regular basis.
That said, your point is way off. OS X is not updated anymore than any major OS today. The updates are small updates as well. Taken a look at at the windows update list these days? Mostly security patches but core files are being updated.
OS X is based on a well known set of code and a standard driver model has been in place for some time. USB is also a standard. The problem is HP releasing a scanner and selling to both the Mac and Windows market as a USB Scanner. my understanding is that it is a parallel-port scanner internally, with an internal USB-parallel converter. Hence the issue with OS X USB. Cost of the scanner is not an issue.
Oh yeah, other scanners, from HP and other companies, manage to stay up-to-date, so it must be possible. Using your argument, all HP products should be lacking drivers but that is not the case. Even HP thought they could have drivers by 9/02. That was the original release date posted on the HP site. Then 11/02, then first QTR of 03. Only 3 scanners on the list still do not support OS 10.2.3-10.2.6, the 4400, 5300, and 6300. Of those, all are supported on 10.1.3-10.1.5 except the 4400. It is the ONLY ONE with NO OS X Support. That is HP, but your email shows your position before you even type.



