Article:
 |
|
Privacy and Anonymity in Email
|
| Subject: |
|
Freenet is the answer |
| Date: |
|
2003-06-17 14:42:10 |
| From: |
|
quilty
|
Response to: Freenet is the answer
|
|
I think Freenet is great. It needs a bit more polish in the implementation, and improvement of some topology issues; but I find it very promising.
However, the model of Freenet is quite different from that of email. Email--including anonymized versions--is a party-to-party system on a push model. The sender actively directs a message to an intended recipient or recipients. Freenet, in contrast, is pretty much the same as the web: one publisher, many (unspecified) receivers, with a pull model.
It's not that one is better or worse, they are just for different things. I had considered discussing Freenet, but decided that what it did was simply different enough not to warrant inclusion in this particular article.
David Mertz
|
Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.
-
Freenet is the answer
2003-06-26 15:41:13
anonymous2
[View]
Try:
http://eof.sourceforge.net/mail/index.html
http://www.stud.tu-ilmenau.de/~cb4/FreeMail/
Todd