Women in Technology

Hear us Roar



Article:
  JSP Progress Bars
Subject:   Are you kidding?
Date:   2003-06-11 23:27:23
From:   anonymous2
Yes, let's just create threads anywhere that we please in our code and hope we don't have more than 100 users access our system.


Come on O'Reilly, don't you screen the articles that you publish?

Full Threads Oldest First

Showing messages 1 through 7 of 7.

  • Are you kidding?
    2003-08-27 14:35:58  anonymous2 [View]

    I'm not seeing what's wrong,
    if you keep the threads under control.
    I will use this code to do a heavy jdbc thread,
    but the task will be executed only
    once by day.


  • Are you kidding?
    2003-06-30 13:27:00  anonymous2 [View]

    I found the article interesting.

    If you have a request that returns results based on remote web services (1 or more successive requests from the server) then the user's request could be 3x or 4x as long as a regular request.

    Since this is for an intranet site with only ~30 users at a time, the thread issues become negligible.

    In fact, I was trying to dream up something like a jsp progress bar of my own when I saw this article!
  • Are you kidding?
    2003-06-12 07:44:53  anonymous2 [View]

    A pure Java programmer fears not the thread. ;-)
    • Are you kidding?
      2003-08-16 22:42:10  anonymous2 [View]

      all you have to do is devide the total # by 100

      (value / max) * 100 = percent
      percent / 100 = value / max
      percent / 100 * max = value
      percent * max / 100 = value

      DUHH
  • It's Example Code
    2003-06-11 23:53:09  chromatic | O'Reilly AuthorO'Reilly Blogger [View]

    It's a legitimate technique. Andrei was clear with his caveats. Use it where it's appropriate.
    • It's Example Code
      2003-07-01 22:45:16  anonymous2 [View]

      • Clustering VS Progress Bar
        2005-01-18 06:09:49  myraid [View]

        Hi,
        Was just wondering how many do actually use yahoo as mail and you see the progress bar and about the servers. If a server fails, isn't clustering all about transfering load to another in case or a failover ...
        just my two pence,
        Cheers.