Article:  |
Nukes: the Open Source Java CMS | |
| Subject: | Confused | |
| Date: | 2003-06-08 08:26:09 | |
| From: | anonymous2 | |
|
Response to: Confused
|
||
|
So, let's say I've hit machine A in a cluster of 50 machines. What chance is there of me hitting machine J in the same cluster before the session data is replicated to that machine? .1 seconds? .01 seconds? I still have a hard time believing that *all* memory data (figure 500 users at 1k of session data each = 500k) can be replicated across a few dozen machines without there ever being the chance of data not being in sync. It seems like a lot of gyrations to do to get around a central database (which would also help survive power cuts, and which also gives an easier central place to do analysis of user session data from).
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.
-
Confused
2003-12-22 10:26:44 anonymous2 [View]
Are you also saying that "clustering cannot not work". My be you should phone up Sun, BEA and IBM and tell them the bad news...
