Article:
 |
|
Unfinished Business: The One Missing Piece
|
| Subject: |
|
Why leave out eDirectory? |
| Date: |
|
2003-06-03 07:27:53 |
| From: |
|
anonymous2
|
Response to: Why leave out eDirectory?
|
|
There's a problem with this:
"Novell's DirXML product will synchronize eDirectory data stored on a Linux server with [AD] data *stored on a Windows server...*"
We want Linux/UNIX and legacy Windows desktops to connect to UNIX/Linux servers, so what's the point in giving companies an incentive to buy another Micro$oft server? Any Linux/UNIX directory service, if it is to be compatible with AD, needs to be able to run AD *itself*.
|
Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.
-
Why leave out eDirectory?
2003-06-13 06:41:21
anonymous2
[View]
The game plan is install eDirectory, but the problem is the only real CIFS piece at the moment is SAMBA and does not integrated with eDirectory....solution NetWare 7.0 + ZENworks for Linux all coming very soon!