| Article: |
What I Hate About Your Programming Language | |
| Subject: | C, C++, Java, maybe others - zeroth element arrays | |
| Date: | 2003-05-14 08:46:50 | |
| From: | anonymous2 | |
|
Response to: C, C++, Java, maybe others - zeroth element arrays
|
||
| I can't imagine *not* using zero-based arrays. Why waste a perfectly good digit? | ||
Showing messages 1 through 6 of 6.
-
C, C++, Java, maybe others - zeroth element arrays
2003-05-14 09:29:51 anonymous2 [View]
-
C, C++, Java, maybe others - zeroth element arrays
2003-05-14 09:55:38 anonymous2 [View]
The "Why waste a perfectly good digit?" bit was tongue-in-cheek.
But I've been programming so long I really can't imagine not using zero. It's second nature to me now. -
C, C++, Java, maybe others - zeroth element arrays
2003-05-14 10:54:13 anonymous2 [View]
why arrays indexed from zero? cos everybody is used to them. maybe if we all started indexing arrays from 1 back in the day it'd seem sensible, but it has become convention. i'd find it weird if i moved to a new language and found the arrays indexed from 1, it'd spongle all my for-loop logic & annoy me every time i forgot it. -
C, C++, Java, maybe others - zeroth element arrays
2003-05-14 14:39:09 anonymous2 [View]
Naah, you don't really want me to reply with a list of languages that do suport arrays starting 'at one' do you:)
Don't be worried if you ever encounter one though, those languages do not support for-loop logic either.
You'll indeed need an all new logic:
the first is in position one,
the second is in position two,
...
the Nth is in position N.
Hey, I really do like C, but not really for business processing. -
C, C++, Java, maybe others - zeroth element arrays
2003-07-06 00:49:55 anonymous2 [View]
FORTRAN and MATLAB both index from 1.
I migrated from MATLAB to Numerical Python, just to get back to the sweet, nourishing 0 indexing. -
There's a zeroth element?
2003-05-14 13:08:17 anonymous2 [View]
Maybe I'm backwards, but I rarely use the zeroth element. I do know that C and its pointer arithmetic is why there is a zeroth element. But unless the problem absolutely requires it, I just ignore it like a bit of grissle on my steak.



Are you suggesting that *not* using zero means we may run out of digits? Ridiculous. Zero is not an element number - it is an offset.
This is an example of bending the humans to the machine, rather than bending the machine to the humans. IMHO, a fundamental mistake in the approach.