| Article: |
What I Hate About Your Programming Language | |
| Subject: | Perl and CGI . . . | |
| Date: | 2003-05-14 06:33:46 | |
| From: | anonymous2 | |
|
Response to: Perl and CGI . . .
|
||
|
I have no idea what you're talking about. CGI.pm has been the standard perl CGI module for years. Nobody uses anything else.
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 4 of 4.
-
Perl and CGI . . .
2003-05-14 08:02:13 anonymous2 [View]
-
Perl and CGI . . .
2007-02-11 02:01:21 dave_doyle [View]
It's already been done. CGI::Simple is pretty widely used for just that reason. CPAN is your friend. -
Perl and CGI . . .
2003-05-15 11:00:20 anonymous2 [View]
You should think before rolling your own. It has proven to be dangerous, many times over. Consult your local perlmonks to get more details. -
Perl and CGI . . .
2003-05-14 09:57:29 anonymous2 [View]
But have you tested it elsewhere?



CGI.pm is just way too bloated for my personal tastes, so I wrote my own which is very compact, extremely quick (especially in comparison to CGI.pm), and has just the data retrieval and parsing subroutines I want (which is what most perl programmers use CGI.pm for anyway). It does both get and post with mime support, and is compatible with both windows and linux. Haven’t really tested it else ware.