| Article: |
Camino and Safari Compared | |
| Subject: | NO, Safari NOT faster - this needs to stop being said! | |
| Date: | 2003-03-28 11:35:16 | |
| From: | anonymous2 | |
|
Great article on Camino vs. Safari, with the exception of the omission of the Keychain feature advantage that Safari lacks. I'd like to dispel the myth that Safari is faster than Camino. Apple's "benchmarks" have nothing to do with my reality. I just compared sites again, as I have in the past:
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 4 of 4.
-
YES, Safari IS faster.
2003-04-06 22:41:27 anonymous2 [View]
Safari beats the pants off of Camino on both of my machines, neither of which are high-end. It is consistantly faster on both my 700MHZ flat-panel iMac and even on my 500MHZ bondi blue.
-
NO, Safari NOT faster - this needs to stop being said!
2003-04-01 08:35:49 anonymous2 [View]
In what universe is safari faster? Who believes that? Maybe it is on some 1.42 gig dual proc machine, but on every one of my machines (all single proc, some G3, some G4), Camino knocks the pants off of Safari. Safari feels like IE almost when compared with Camino.
-
NO, Safari NOT faster - this needs to stop being said!
2003-03-29 13:19:26 anonymous2 [View]
I agree! They are both fast browsers, but Safari has never been faster for me.
And I am using a dual proc 867 G4.
-
NO, Safari NOT faster - this needs to stop being said!
2003-03-29 07:38:36 anonymous2 [View]
Do you use a double processor? On 2 procs safari flies. Much faster than campino.


