| Article: |
Introduction to Text Indexing with Apache Jakarta Lucene | |
| Subject: | performance | |
| Date: | 2003-01-16 13:34:59 | |
| From: | drunk_injun | |
|
Response to: performance
|
||
|
Lucene performs extremeley well, given the correct configuration. We run a few lucene indexes, the largest of which contains well over 3 million records, and our site averages close to 2MM daily pageviews.
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 5 of 5.
-
performance
2003-04-25 02:02:19 anonymous2 [View]
-
performance
2004-10-18 19:01:17 vfinity [View]
Hi, anyone encounter too many open files in MAC OS X when using lucene?
I suspect that when too many search is in doing , it will cause the whole machine goes down with "too many open files" error.
thanks
-
performance
2003-01-16 13:36:25 drunk_injun [View]
Caveat to last message - the response time of 80ms includes our own modifications to lucene to enable additional sorting and filtering parameters. Raw query times generally average < 25ms. -
performance
2003-01-21 00:35:06 brwnx [View]
thanks for your reply. Im currently struggling on implementing alta vista on a customer project. It being written in C and with a lousy java api makes interop very difficult. I will see if i cn get the time to test out lucene instead.. -
performance
2003-01-17 05:02:57 anonymous2 [View]
sounds promising...Im currently struggling trying to integrate Alta Vista on a customers project. AV has very bad documentation and is written in c, making interop pretty difficult..I will see if i can get the time to try out Lucene in this setting...
thanks for your reply..



I am using lucene for text searches. Actually I am trying to make the searches faster.
I just wanted some inputs regarding the configuration changes that you have made to lucene. What are h/w configurations you are using etc.
I would be very glad to receive your replies at swati_virmani@yahoo.com
TIA,
-Swati