Article:
 |
|
Why Human Rights Requires Free Software
|
| Subject: |
|
Brett, your objection is pointless |
| Date: |
|
2002-10-12 17:50:13 |
| From: |
|
adamsj
|
Response to: Human rights require truly free software, not the FSF's "Free" (Not!) software
|
|
Your objection is to the use of the GPL in commercial software.
Andy Oram's entire article is about non-commercial software for human rights workers.
Thus, your objection is pointless.
Further, every license restricts the rights of those who accept it. For this reason, your final sentence (which finally gets around to the issue at hand) does not reach a valid conclusion.
|
Showing messages 1 through 5 of 5.
-
Brett, your objection is pointless
2007-08-09 02:41:37
crosbie
[View]
-
The above is dead wrong.
2002-10-13 00:03:46
brettglass
[View]
-
Now that you've clarified...
2002-10-13 06:30:46
John W. Adams |
[View]
-
Article 23 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
2002-10-13 13:25:57
brettglass
[View]
-
which point...
2002-10-17 21:40:13
david_given
[View]
The GPL is almost a completely rights restoring licence.