View Review Details


Book:   Head First Physics
Subject:   I recommend this book to any physics student
Date:   2008-12-02 20:59:19
From:   Anonymous Reader
Rating:  StarStarStarStarStar


My introduction to physics occurred a long time ago. At that time, I had decided I wanted to be an engineer. I didn't really know what an engineer did, but I knew I wanted to be one.


I also knew that physics was a requirement for engineers. For me (looking back), physics was knowledge necessary to reach my end goal, plus I was fascinated with the subject.


That may not be the case for all students. For those students with a need for an introductory level of physics knowledge, the Head First Physics book will be a helpful supplement to any text associated with a formal course in physics, which can be initially intimidating--there are so many topics to cover. There is an interesting graphic on page 2 of the Head First Physics book that list over 60 topics. That graphic also appears on page 861--at the end of the book--and elsewhere throughout the book.


Most of the topics listed in that graphic are discussed in the Head First Physics book, in a way that is informal and non-threatening. To use the author's (and publisher's) words, the book is written in a "conversational style" and uses "multiple learning styles." This approach is effective, in my opinion, provided that the student recognizes that the book should be used as a supplement, as mentioned above.


I have two minor criticisms of this book. First, in Chapter 2, Units and Measurements, the author provides a useful discussion of significant digits and rounding for measurements. What is missing, in my opinion, is a least an introductory discussion of resolution versus accuracy.


Second, there is a discussion of experimentation in Chapter 5. However, what is missing, again in my opinion, is at least an introductory discussion of the scientific method: hypothesis, experiment, analysis, conclusion, new hypothesis, etc. The book is, after all, a science text.


Despite those criticisms, I recommend this book to any physics student.

Full Threads Oldest First
  • Heather Lang photo Resolution vs accuracy is covered in chapter 4,  December 13 2008
    Submitted by Heather Lang | O'Reilly Author   [Respond | View]

    Just a note to say that resolution (or precision as it is often known) vs accuracy is discussed in chapter 4, pages 112-113. It was originally slated to be in chapter 2, but would have been "just in case" at that point - not related to the scenario and tacked on, so not particularly memorable. In chapter 4 the topic is introduced "just in time" - it's something that's crucial at that point because you've just done an experiment and "keep on getting a different answer".

    And as you say, elsewhere in chapter 4 (and in several other chapters) the scientific method of "hypothesis, experiment, analysis, conclusion" is put into practise without these commonly-used headings being stated for the stages.

    With hindsight, a brief summary of these headings would be useful, as you say. Though I'd hope that by the time the learner has reached the end of the book they'll have absorbed the process through doing it a few times, and would be able to say "guess, experiment, graph, equation" instead, which is roughly equivalent.