View Review Details
| Book: |
|
Spring: A Developer's Notebook |
| Subject: |
|
Such poor quality editing/testing! |
| Date: |
|
2005-07-12 07:40:21 |
| From: |
|
mflgeek
|
|
|
O'Reilly have really taken their eye off the ball with this one. Usually accurate and precise, they have succummed to the trend (most notably set by the original Wrox Press) of producing books on the latest subject matter as soon as the first draft has been delivered by the writer(s).
It's really obvious with this publication; There are so many glaring omissions, typographical errors and just plain mistakes that as I complete a section, I am filled with dread at what errors await over the next page.
I'm fed up trying to debug someone elses errors; I do that every day anyway :(
|
"Spring: A Developer's Notebook is an attractive and ambitious book dealing with multiple advanced topics."
--Howard Carson, KickStartNews.com
-
Such poor quality editing/testing!, July 12 2005
Submitted by Anonymous Reader [Respond | View]
Yes, I admit, we screwed up, at least on the technical side. We made some last minute changes to the code (particularly in Chapter 2) that backfired; they weren't sufficiently tested. We're sorry about that: it shouldn't have happened.
We've been busy since discovering the problems. We had a second technical review, to find *all* the problems with the code, and we've corrected them. The second printing has just gone to the printer. We'd be glad to send you, and other readers who have the first printing, a cMeopy of the reprint when it's available.
Mike Loukides
Editor, O'Reilly Media, Inc.