I think you misunderstood me. I made tests where I recorded my guitar and hummel in both formats - WAVs at various resolutions and 1-bit files. In each case, I took pains not to move and to play as consistantly as I could.
The "clear difference" I heard was between the tests I originally recorded as WAVs and the 1-bit files.
I then took the 1-bit files and converted them to WAVs using the AudioGate software. Comparing them to the files I'd just recorded as WAVs was revealing:
In fact, I thought the files converted from 1-bit to WAVs sounded subtly smoother than similar WAV recordings I'd made as a control.
Of course, a 1-bit file converted down to 44.1/16 cannot possibly have as much detail as the original. But there is an advantage in capturing as much information as possible before making the conversion.
I'm afraid I did not make any direct comparisons between the Mr-1 and any other digital recorder, though that would be an interesting idea. Anyone out there want to try?
cheers,
Mark
Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.
Review of M-Audio MicroTrack II
2008-09-10 23:21:05
Symbols
[View]
Mark, great review of the M-Audio MicroTrack. I have the first one and think I'll hold off on the new one, thanks to your great review.
John Fraim
PS ... see our website for our music ...
http://web.mac.com/johnfraim/iWeb/Site/Welcome.html
Mark, great review of the M-Audio MicroTrack. I have the first one and think I'll hold off on the new one, thanks to your great review.
John Fraim
PS ... see our website for our music ...
http://web.mac.com/johnfraim/iWeb/Site/Welcome.html