We've expanded our news coverage and improved our search! Visit
news.oreilly.com for the latest or search for all things across O'Reilly!
Article:
 |
|
Using Design by Contract in C
|
| Subject: |
|
Expressing relatiionships between input and output values |
| Date: |
|
2006-12-03 16:20:19 |
| From: |
|
ThadSmith
|
|
|
|
I like the DBC concept and want to explore extending my current implementation from free-form comments regarding in/out conditions to (semi-)automated testing.
My concern with the proposed DBC for C is the lack of mechanism for expressing the relationship of input values to output values, especially if an aggregate (array or struct, either parameter or static) is being modified by the function. Obviously this would require, in the worst case, making a temporary copy of the input to use in verifying the output, as well as a notation for distinguishing separate input and output values.
Does anyone have thoughts on the tradeoffs and feasibility of automating this?
|