Article:
 |
|
POJO Application Frameworks: Spring Vs. EJB 3.0
|
| Subject: |
|
opinion piece veiled as objective article |
| Date: |
|
2006-02-22 07:28:10 |
| From: |
|
steve--o
|
Response to: opinion piece veiled as objective article
|
|
i found the article to be excellent and unbiased.. the spring XML files are verbose crap.. i don't like xml as you've probably guessed..
in fact the article was so informative that i will now use jboss and EJB for the first time.. i have always found it to be a pack of complex bother and spring did not get me to jump in.. thank you michael.. incidently, i have a phd from USC and a MS from MIT and 25 years programming experience so don't make the mistake of thinking i'm a lightweight.. i'm hoping that design by committe has for once cleaned up the pathetic mess that is EJB and a lot of J2EE..
|
Showing messages 1 through 2 of 2.
-
opinion piece veiled as objective article
2008-01-10 11:53:22
Rick010
[View]
-
opinion piece veiled as objective article
2008-05-06 22:50:02
HumbleMan
[View]
I have gotta situation.
I am going for release of my app tomorrow, i followed everything to the toe and then suddenly i've gotta do some changes in code ... for this i have to do a build ( build and then deploy the EAR / WAR or whatever ). Now suppose that i am writing configurations for all POJOs to-be-persisted in xml, all i have to do is change xml file configurations. On the other hand if i am doing annotations i have to go in code and do something ( blah blah ). My code was "frozen" state until now. Technically making jsp, HTML or xml changes do not come in code changes ( as per my company policy at least ) so yea i am safe when i working with xml. we do a build and all is solved ... But what would happen if i am using annotations ...
Regards
Vyas, Anirudh