Interesting article, debunking many commonly-held myths. However, there are some factors which I don't think you haven't brought out in your article.
The origins of free software / open-source
The first recorded open-source project was over fifty years ago in a commercial environment - see http://jpmcc.blogdns.org/index.php/2005/12/11/its-the-big-5-0-for-open-source. Open-source was born in the commercial world.
The opening-up of programming to non-professionals</string>
Hobby computing was triggered by cheap computers with basic compilers in the early 1980s, many years before internet access became commonplace.
It's getting easier to produce software
I would argue that if anything it takes more effort to code a game than it did ten years ago. Why? we expect so much more from 'a game'. The same is true in commercial computing. Ten years ago a payroll system would have been COBOL and green screens talking to DB/2 - now it's a multi-layered architecture with an HTML, Java, application servers, stored procedures in databases ...
Economic forces dictate open-source
There are economic forces at work here, but I think Nicholas Carr was closer to the true cause and effect in his notorious Does IT Matter article. Once software becomes a commodity, then price becomes the dominant factor. Does your word processor give your organisation competitive advantage? NO - ditch MS-Word, use OpenOffice.org Writer.
Finally, it is worth remembering that the biggest supplier of the biggest commodity software - the desktop operating system - is still very healthy financially, thank you...
Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.
More layers of debunking
2006-01-19 12:01:00
jpmcc
[View]
Aargh ... I hate dumb systems that don't let you preview and fix typos before posting...