| Weblog: |
|
Aperture on a PowerBook, Pt. 2 - Raw Files & CS2
|
| Subject: |
|
Camera Raw + Aperture = No sense |
| Date: |
|
2005-12-05 11:41:14 |
| From: |
|
LouM
|
|
|
|
Derrick, it doesn't make any sense to use Aperture with Camera Raw, does it?
Aperture won't recognize any changes you make, so there'd be no versioning of any kind until you re-import a PSD or TIFF back into Aperture.
If you want to use Camera Raw--other than as a very rare case--then Aperture is not the right tool for you.
The question is: Should Apple spend time and money developing Aperture into a product that can use other companies' raw converters. IMHO, the answer to that question is 'no'. Apple should spend its time & money adding photographer-friendly features to Aperture.
|
Showing messages 1 through 2 of 2.
-
Camera Raw + Aperture = No sense
2005-12-12 15:16:14
LittleJim
[View]
|
Showing messages 1 through 2 of 2.
|
There are other reasons, related to raw image processing I don't like it. For example, the lack of a curves function. Doing any kind of curves manipulation during the raw conversion process is always going to be better than doing so in Photoshop and the fact that it's missing seems like a big limitation to me.