advertisement

Weblog:   AJAX and Java: Toolbox
Subject:   DWR invasive??
Date:   2005-11-29 10:14:32
From:   debradley
Response to: DWR invasive??

"service-level classes that already exist in my class" should (maybe) obviously be "service-level classes that already exist in my app"
Full Threads Oldest First

Showing messages 1 through 3 of 3.

  • Robert Cooper photo DWR invasive??
    2005-11-29 10:20:25  Robert Cooper | O'Reilly Blogger [Reply | View]

    Sorry, perhaps I was a little unclear there.

    It is definitely not invasive w/r/t your service beans. However, working with your services directly from the client implies (at more than one level) that you are actually building a whole fat-client-style functionality into the HTML/JavaScript. As opposed to AJAXTags or Taconite where even your presentation layer can remain mosty unchanged from a vanilla HTML/Struts app.

    DWR is might cool, but if you are attempting to retrofit an application with AJAX functionality, extensive used of DWR does require a rethinking of your presentation layer.
    • Robert Cooper photo DWR invasive??
      2005-11-29 10:21:17  Robert Cooper | O'Reilly Blogger [Reply | View]

      /used of/use of/g
      • DWR invasive??
        2005-11-30 10:19:34  debradley [Reply | View]

        O/T, but wouldn't it be nice if you could edit your comments here?
Showing messages 1 through 3 of 3.