imaps has been around for a LONG time in most mail clients. The fact that they've caught up to the state of the art from 3 years ago is no cause for joy.
Plus, mail-savvy users will know that authentication can take place on *sending* mail, not just *receiving* mailboxes. The mail app doesn't support encrypted SMTP, either on the traditional port 465, or using the STARTTLS command. This feature is present in ALL real mail clients out there today except Mail.app. It is foolish to assure users that their passwords are safe this may not be the case.
On a broader note, I have to emphatically disagree with the statement that apple is warm to encryption technologies. If apple were serious about encryption, as the author suggests, then they would be supporting transport level encryption options like IPsec, a standard part of the IPv6 networking stack which is conspicuously absent from MacOS X. IPsec supports host-to-host and gateway-to-gateway encryption (VPNs), which many favour as the long-term solution for encryption on the net.
For heaven's sakes, you can't even mount a webdav fileserver using https on this operating system.
While I'm enjoying having NEXTSTEP back, I for one won't be doing any encryption dances until IPsec is standard in the operating system.
Colin Henein
Showing messages 1 through 2 of 2.
Apple NOT great on encryption
2003-06-11 11:17:38
anonymous2
[View]
OSX has support for IPSec, it just doesn't yet have a GUI to configure it. There are however third party apps that allow you to take advantage of the built-in IPSec.
Further OSX has PPTP client support, for those with MS centric infrastructure....
Apple NOT great on encryption
2002-04-20 16:17:11
dasper
[View]
I just talked to support staff at worldnet.att.net after trying to turn SSL on for my account there. They informed me that mail.app support is not fully implemented, agreeing with the previous message.
Further OSX has PPTP client support, for those with MS centric infrastructure....