| Sign In/My Account | View Cart |
| Weblog: | All Property Is Intellectual: Real Estate & The 62 Cent Cracker | |
| Subject: | Ideas are not property | |
| Date: | 2005-06-25 16:17:44 | |
| From: | SpencerCritchley | |
|
Response to: Ideas are not property
|
||
|
It sounds like we actually agree with other on a lot of this, and that I misunderstood your use of the words "ideas" and "implementation". I agree with you that "ideas cannot be property, they are not patentable. But specific implementation of ideas can perfectly be made property with copyright", in your sense that general ideas like passion can't and shouldn't be copyrighted, but a specific piece of passionate music by Mozart can be.
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.
| Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1. |
I think the extreme view that any information is inherently non-proprietary
just because it is information is simply a misperception of some new business
models that some industry players tried to push for. It seems to me that
"information wants to be free" slogan was actually coined in an effort to
market new business models that give away copyrighted information (like music)
freely and have revenue collection point somewhere else, but that slogan was
(and likely was intended to be) misunderstood as if absolutely all information
is inherently non-proprietary, which would generally be wrong. Nevertheless, my
point is that generally it still possible to have something that is
inherently non-proprietary, and that ideas inherently, as well as by
decision, should not be allowed to become someone's property.
Anyway, I am glad that we understood each other.