Article:
 |
|
Tired of Inkjet Snapshots? The Canon CP-220 to the Rescue
|
| Subject: |
|
40¢? |
| Date: |
|
2004-12-12 20:36:04 |
| From: |
|
webb_k
|
Response to: 40¢?
|
|
I have a compact dye sub printer from Kodak (Easy Share Printer Dock 6000). Each print costs about 55 cents, but like Derrick, I absolutely love the quality and the ease of use.
I own an Epson 2200 photo printer ($700) and generally love the printer for what I need from it, but it's a pain (and a waste of paper) to get a single 4x6 photo.
I put my Kodak Easy Share camera (DX 6490 - recommended by Consumer Reports - $400) on the top of Kodak's compact dye sub printer ($150) and press the print button. After the 4 passes (yellow, red, blue, protection) it's finished and the print looks great - better than my Epson.
I'm not sure why the consumables (paper and ribbon) cost more than the Canon CP-220's consumables. I get 40 sheets with matching ribbon for about $22.00 at my local Walmart - about $.55
My brother got the HP ink-jet compact printer for his camera. The quality of the Kodak dye-sub prints is head and shoulders above the ink-jets from his portable HP printer.
|
Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.
-
DX 6490 and PD 6000+
2004-12-17 06:44:27
MSchienle
[Reply | View]
We looked at the Epson at the time and felt that it was a better deal as far as per-print prices are concerned. We went with the Kodak for the convenience of having one less USB attachment on the desktop since the Kodak printer dock is also the charging base for our Kodak camera.
We've had a couple HP inkjets, HP-970 and -990, that we always thought made beautiful photos. They do, but they compare poorly to the Kodak output.