| Weblog: | iMac + iBook >= PowerBook? | |
| Subject: | Slightly different configuration | |
| Date: | 2004-10-20 08:28:44 | |
| From: | tpherndon | |
|
I'd like to propose a slightly different configuration for you, and get your reaction to it. Instead of the iMac + iBook, consider a PowerBook + an external monitor (and, optionally, external keyboard and mouse).
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 2 of 2.
-
Slightly different configuration
2004-10-21 08:57:27 Chris Adamson |
[Reply | View]
-
Second
2004-10-20 09:01:36 mwalker [Reply | View]
I'd like to second this idea. At work, I have a 12" PB generally hooked to a 17" monitor, with a standard keyboard & mouse. I use the main screen for most things, and I have a small second screen if I need it, and a very portable laptop for travel.
A 15" screen might be a little better, even for travel (since I don't do work actually _on_ the plane), but my arrangement suits me just fine. I've never found the 12" screen too small to work on.
| Showing messages 1 through 2 of 2. |




Well, let's do the math: add the $250 monitor to the $1999 PowerBook and we're at $2259... just $49 less than the price of the iMac and the iBook combined. And the PowerBook has a much slower CPU (1.33 GHz G4 vs 1.6 GHz G5), slower bus speed (167 MHz vs 533 MHz), smaller and slower hard drive (60 GB 4200 RPM vs 80 GB 7200 RPM). To be fair, the PowerBook has built-in Airport Extreme, and this arrangement does permit monitor spanning (not something I'm interested in, but it has its place).
Nevertheless, my point is that for a laptop to be a potential desktop replacement, it at least has to be close to its desktop equivalent, and right now, the graying PowerBook line delivers much less capability for much more money than the iMac and PowerMac desktops... so much so that a whole bottom-end laptop, the 12" iBook, can be squeezed in the margin
-Chris (invalidname)