| Weblog: |
|
Why I am not a platform zealot
|
| Subject: |
|
Open Standards Zealot |
| Date: |
|
2004-05-27 10:18:20 |
| From: |
|
jgehtland
|
Response to: Open Standards Zealot
|
|
Ahhhhh....I see the confusion now, thanks. ;-)
So, let me go back and make it perfectly clear: it was not that he had never seen fsck. It was that he'd never seen the Mac in CLI mode. It was unclear whether or not he'd ever seen ANYTHING in CLI mode, but he was, and this was clear from further discussion with him, that he had no idea that the Mac could be interacted with in that way.
I hope that helps clear it up.
|
Showing messages 1 through 4 of 4.
-
Red Herring Argument
2004-05-27 10:36:46
jmincey
[View]
-
Red Herring Argument
2004-05-27 10:45:14
Justin Gehtland |
[View]
-
Red Herring Argument
2004-05-27 11:26:27
jmincey
[View]
|
Showing messages 1 through 4 of 4.
|
In my experience, even the Apple SALES people (at their retail stores) are quite aware that OS X includes a "Terminal" utility which permits access to the UNIX shells and shell tools (and CLI syntax). They may not all know about single-user mode specifically, but even this is fairly common knowledge to anyone who is so much as a casual visitor to the discussion forums on Apple's web site. I have been pleasantly surprised by the technical fluency of the staff at the Apple stores.
This is why I suggest you may have misunderstood the individual you spoke with. When they spoke of never having seen something before, maybe they were referring to the specific error message which was being reported. And in any event, the Apple people have a protocol to confer with each other in the event one can't help a customer with his problem. No employee can know everything.
Meantime, I'm not among those who thinks Apple (or Steve Jobs) walks on water. At the end of the day, the Macintosh is a machine and OS X is an operating system designed and developed by fallible humans. But I don't know anyone who says anything to the contrary. Even the greatest Mac proponent will acknowledge that the Mac is not flawless -- after all, if it were without flaw, then there would be no need for Apple to release bug-fix updates nor for Apple to maintain a large tech support department. So let me suggest this is a red herring -- you are arguing against a position that no one takes in the first place. (Or can you indeed show me someone who contends that the Mac is a perfect machine?)