|
Your article is a classic case of bait and switch. Given your headline, I had expected to read an essay on the merits of multiple platforms and how each has its pros and cons and is well suited to some tasks and not to others. I had expected that you would come down in favor of diversity of platforms for purposes of security and of tailoring computers to the end which they are intended to serve. Finally, I had expected to read something in favor of open standards and platform-independent networking.
Of course, there is none of this in your article. Instead, it is a diatribe about your negative experiences with a Macintosh. Now all file systems are vulnerable to corruption, and it sounds as though your boot blocks may have been trashed somehow. (Did you get an error message about "Invalid key length" by chance?) Be that as it may, I simply don't believe that an employee designated to be an Apple "genius" at a retail store didn't know what a command line was and didn't know that the Mac offered it. No one will be acquainted with all error messages or all software utilities -- of course not. But your article goes over the top and strains credulity.
With each Mac Apple ships a restore disk which includes a separate partition of diagnostic and repair utilities. It will perform a full panoply of hardware tests for you (among other things). Apple's disk utilities are indeed modest -- and Apple acknowledges as much. I look forward to more robust tools from Apple in the future, (though Windows itself does not include robust disk repair tools -- otherwise there would not be such a healthy third-party market in this area).
I have installed a number of Airport cards -- including several in iBooks, and I have had no trouble with keyboards. You just have to take some care -- that's all. Laptop keyboards are notorious for being fragile, and if you don't think so, inquire with IBM as to its Thinkpad keyboard failure rates.
Let me suggest that in an effort to appear even-handed and objective you are -- with your bogus headline -- guilty of false advertising. Your article has NOTHING to do with the merits of multiple platforms; and a more accurate and honest headline would have been this:
"A Switcher's Bad Experience with a Macintosh"
-Jeff Mincey
|
A) I'm sorry you were offended by my blog post. At least, I'm assuming you were offended, since your tone implies it.
B) The title wasn't bait and switch at all; it was, perhaps, too short, but, heck, my post clearly explains why I am not a raving platform zealot, after all. ;-)
C) More to the point, please, whatever you think of my post, don't call me a liar. If you'd like to talk to me or my wife (who was standing next to me) about the Apple "genius" who clearly had never seen single user mode, you can contact me directly. justin at relevancellc dot com. I know that the geniuses can't know everything, but c'mon. I'm not ignorant, nor am I a liar. I'm merely reporting what happened to me.
D) I spent three days with the repair disks, with Norton and with DiskWarrior. None solved my problem. The diagnostic and repair utilities would not fix the permissions problems (it would report them fixed, but when I reran the scan, the problems were still there), Norton wouldn't touch the primary partition and DiskWarrior fixed some of the issues, but not all.
E) I'm glad your experience with installing Airport cards went smoothly. Mine did not.
F) My post was not a diatribe against the Mac. Only against those people who have been telling me, even in the face of my recent experience, that the Mac is a panacea. It isn't. Nothing is.