|
I did some comparing of numbers for similar systems myself, and came up with a $5000 PC as compared to a $10.000 Mac for the same basic specs.
Sure you might at the low end get a Mac cheap, just as you can get a cheap PC.
But Macs still outshine PCs in the cost arena when you go into the highend machines.
Or take a powerbook and compare that to an equivalent Dell or HP laptop.
Your attempt is just another Mac-adept trying to make up bogus arguments why his God is God.
Barebones G5 1.6GHz will set you back over 2000 without a screen, cheapest screen to go with it costs over 800 (those are figures from Apple's own website btw).
Some little configuring to get to the same point as what I consider minimum specs (19" screen, 1GB RAM, 128MB vidRAM, larger harddisk) and we're up to over 4300 for the Apple (despite their generous 150 discount when buying a screen with it).
For just under 2300 I can get me a Dell with a 3GHz P4 and otherwise the same specs (20" TFT, same videocard, sized harddisk and RAM, etc. etc.).
|
In fact I was unable configure a Dell exactly as the G5 and ended up with 2 configurations that came close to the G5 and the result? The price difference was Euro 300 in configuration 1 and Euro 700 in configuration 2, the G5 Mac was cheaper in both cases! I did not include a monitor in these calculations because with both machines the same monitor can be used using a DVI connection. However I preferred the Apple 17" display.
Of course I bought the 2x2GHz G5 and I am still extremely happy it. :-)
The PowerBook to PC notebook comparison is a different story. Here I think Apple still has to do a lot to lower prices and more importantly, increase the quality of their PowerBooks.
A month ago I had to return a G4 PowerBook 1.25 GHz (for full refund) after 3 failed repair attempts by Apple. The display as well as the keyboard were way below standard in a notebook with a Euro 3500 price tag.