|
I don't understand why you suddenly get personal, most probably because you are a mac idiot. Instead of trying to be to the point, you seem to be more agressive, despite the fact that the author is really trying to discuss the real issues.
By doing this, you void your whole posts, because it seems to me that they are either made-up or that you simply don't know enough about APIs and Quartz.
You already stopped discussing the real issues, you are trying to discussing your own stuff. You never attempted to understand what the author says, instead you seem to try to save Apple's ass here, thinking that if you somehow make the point that quartz is great and actually far more better, than you would be done.
Here is how things went.
A mac idiot claimed that Quartz is actually working the same way as Avalon, because he reads too much slashdot or mac magazines.
The author, as someone who knows what he is talking about refuted the idea.
Another mac idiot came in and said bunch of stuff which didn't say much with respect to the fact that quartz is not a revolutionary api after all. He sort of continued to attack the author, but suprisingly (to me) the author was very patient and still to the point.
Finally another mac idiot come in, who in this case seem to know more than other mac idiots, and again said bunch of stuff.
If you ask whether quartz is something like avalon or not, it is clear that it is not and that quartz is not something revolutionary and that what you have in quartz is also in windows xp.
With all the mac idiots coming in, trying to attack the author personally, all we got is a long thread without much substance from the mac idiots. I don't get this, why are you guys so stupid?
|